Publishedduration1 hour ago
The government has suffered defeats in the House of Lords in an ongoing tussle over post-Brexit food standards.
Peers struck down an amendment made by MPs last week to the Agriculture Bill.
It now returns to the Commons in the parliamentary “ping-pong” that happens when the two Houses can’t agree.
Peers voted on Tuesday to ensure trade deals meet UK animal welfare and food safety rules, amid fears imports of chlorinated chicken and beef fattened with hormones will be allowed.
The government says it backs high food standards but does not want to include such guarantees in the Agriculture Bill, arguing that MPs will get a say when any post-Brexit regulations in trade deals come before Parliament.
But Labour’s shadow environment minister Lord Grantchester said protections for the UK’s high food standards need to be included in the Agriculture Bill.
Speaking during a debate on the bill, he told the Lords: “Future standards can be changed through technical statutory orders.
“We seek to put in primary legislation what the government has claimed is in the Withdrawal Act.”
media captionJamie Oliver accuses the government of using “back door” secondary legislation to avoid scrutiny of post-Brexit food standards
Tory peer the Earl of Caithness said: “The government has been unnecessarily obstructive and intransigent on this bill.
“And that is a huge sadness because they are alienating a lot of farmers and a lot of those who live in the country who see the government as being unnecessarily reluctant to accept any improvements to this bill.”
Independent crossbencher Lord Curry of Kirkharle said: “The fear of cheap imported food undermining our standards of production as a result of trade deals that have not been adequately scrutinised has united all key stakeholders from the entire farming community.”
Responding for the government, environment minister Lord Gardiner said the government was determined to have “a robust and positive relationship with the people who are